First, I feel a duty to give back to the community. One of the most important contributions we can make, as writers, is to support other writers. As writers, we know the challenge of stringing together nouns and verbs to come up with something meaningful. A book is an accomplishment, and as such is worthy of recognition, but many books go into the world ignored by the media, facing the reading public without a single review.
Second, reading a book in preparation for a review forces a level of focus that is generally absent during my routine reading. When I have to write about the words I read, I pay attention.
Third, good book reviews are creative works. They are not—or should not be—formulaic. Good book reviews hook readers. They identify links between superficially disparate topics. They establish a relationship between readers and both the author of the book under review and the author of the review itself. Good book reviews are creative essays, but unlike most creative essays they can find reasonably certain outlets for publication.
Fourth, writing reviews makes me feel a bit closer to the publishing industry. It makes me feel like I am in the game. Writers are of course at the heart of the publishing business, but working with no one but my keyboard for company for hours on end can leave me feeling a bit detached. A review brings me closer to the center. It brings me in contact with a book review editor and it brings me closer to another author and that author’s publisher. It leaves me feeling like less of a hermit and more a part of a larger movement.
So with those four reasons about why I write reviews behind me, what about four tips for others who might be interested in writing reviews? I am not at all qualified to provide these tips, but in any case here you go.
Tip 1: Think positive. If a book is so bad that nothing good can be written about it, the book should not be reviewed.
Tip 2: Be thoughtful, in the sense of remembering that authors are human too. Every book is flawed, and a review should not be advertising copy, but reviewers should be sensitive to human feelings when discussing the flaws of the author’s creation. So don’t ignore the flaws, but don’t dwell on them, and try to present them juxtaposed with the positive. Also be thoughtful, but in the other sense of the word. That is, think about what you have read for a while. Then think about it some more. Then write a draft review, think about what you have written, tear it up, and write another draft. The work under review deserves the effort.
Tip 3: Avoid conflicts of interest. Reviewing a book by your best friend is probably not acceptable. Likewise, forget about reviewing books by your wife, husband, partner, mom, dad, son, daughter, and cousin. As a general rule, you should avoid reviewing books published by your own publisher, and you should certainly avoid reviewing books edited by your own editor.
Thank you for posting this, and for the clarity and rightness of your words.
This comes at a great time for me, as I have chosen to embrace my aberrant love of writing critical papers (shared by few of my classmates in my MFA program) and seek out more book-reviewing opportunities. I'm seeking it as a way of giving back, and as an application of my own creative writing that may be useful to other people, and may get published sooner than my own poetry and essays, while the latter move toward fruition. It's definitely affording an enticing sense of connection with the literary world.
Thanks again!
Ela
And here's another place to get one's reviewing feet wet — annotations (not truly reviews, but just as interesting) for writers by writers. A good place for MFA-ers to re-use/publish their annotations and become part of a wider online community.
http://annotationnation.wordpress.com/about/
Loved this post, Bill!